这是一个创建于 5505 天前的主题，其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
现在 www.v2ex.com 这个域名跑在一个高科技上，大家感觉和 v2ex.appspot.com 相比速度如何呢？
 | 1 freefcw 2010-09-19 15:54:24 +08:00 ……高科技上，好玄乎 |
 | 2 kingnib 2010-09-19 15:55:15 +08:00 没啥感觉 |
 | 3 disinfeqt 2010-09-19 15:55:32 +08:00 还是有点慢，不是秒开 =.= |
 | 4 napoleonu 2010-09-19 15:56:35 +08:00 还不错。。 |
 | 5 allenm 2010-09-19 15:57:00 +08:00 感觉不出来差异 |
 | 6 Livid MOD OP PRO 大家可以 ping 一下 www.v2ex.com 然后把结果贴上来看看。 |
 | 7 macji 2010-09-19 15:57:50 +08:00 感觉速度有提升. 求真相.... |
 | 8 chouj 2010-09-19 15:59:13 +08:00 206 201 204 221 ms |
 | 9 yiyang 2010-09-19 16:00:05 +08:00 64 bytes from 119.147.113.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=38.4 ms |
| 10 allenm 2010-09-19 16:00:05 +08:00 Request timed out. |
 | 11 smallcolor 2010-09-19 16:00:21 +08:00 http://cl.ly/2SZk 什么情况？ |
 | 13 Chris 2010-09-19 16:01:33 +08:00 上海，联通，request time out (￣￣") |
 | 14 yoyicue 2010-09-19 16:01:48 +08:00 PING c01.v2ex.com (184.106.207.47) 56(84) bytes of data. ping不通 |
 | 15 voidman 2010-09-19 16:01:51 +08:00 杭州电信 ping www.v2ex.com 正在 Ping c01.v2ex.com [184.106.207.47] 具有 32 字节的数据: 请求超时。 请求超时。 请求超时。 请求超时。 184.106.207.47 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 0，丢失 = 4 (100% 丢失)， ping v2ex.appspot.com 正在 Ping appspot.l.google.com [74.125.153.141] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 74.125.153.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=73ms TTL=48 来自 74.125.153.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=73ms TTL=48 来自 74.125.153.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=73ms TTL=48 来自 74.125.153.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=74ms TTL=48 74.125.153.141 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 73ms，最长 = 74ms，平均 = 73ms |
 | 16 flytwokites 2010-09-19 16:04:15 +08:00 好象没appspot的快。 ping www.v2ex.com 平均165。 ping v2ex.appspot.com为什么只有38？ 上个httping的结果： [~]$ httping -c5 -GbsSg http://v2ex.appspot.com/ PING v2ex.appspot.com:80 (http://v2ex.appspot.com/): connected to v2ex.appspot.com:80, seq=0 time=43.46+1211.90=1255.36 ms 200 OK 137KB/s connected to v2ex.appspot.com:80, seq=1 time=40.56+441.46=482.02 ms 200 OK 419KB/s connected to v2ex.appspot.com:80, seq=2 time=43.17+419.38=462.55 ms 200 OK 394KB/s connected to v2ex.appspot.com:80, seq=3 time=43.88+433.11=476.98 ms 200 OK 390KB/s connected to v2ex.appspot.com:80, seq=4 time=42.64+399.41=442.05 ms 200 OK 404KB/s --- http://v2ex.appspot.com/ ping statistics --- 5 connects, 5 ok, 0.00% failed round-trip min/avg/max = 442.0/623.8/1255.4 ms Transfer speed: min/avg/max = 137/349/419 KB [~]$ httping -c5 -GbsSg http://www.v2ex.com/ PING www.v2ex.com:80 (http://www.v2ex.com/): connected to www.v2ex.com:80, seq=0 time=160.82+2747.31=2908.14 ms 200 OK 21KB/s connected to www.v2ex.com:80, seq=1 time=141.90+2638.16=2780.06 ms 200 OK 17KB/s connected to www.v2ex.com:80, seq=2 time=165.47+4242.45=4407.92 ms 200 OK 10KB/s connected to www.v2ex.com:80, seq=3 time=130.78+2652.85=2783.63 ms 200 OK 17KB/s www.v2ex.com:80, seq=4 time=166.48+2181.72=2348.21 ms 200 OK 34KB/s --- http://www.v2ex.com/ ping statistics --- 5 connects, 5 ok, 0.00% failed round-trip min/avg/max = 2348.2/3045.6/4407.9 ms Transfer speed: min/avg/max = 10/20/34 KB |
| 17 Livid MOD OP PRO 如果 ping 的时候出现 c01 那么是因为你本地的 DNS 信息还没有刷新，那么可能感觉不到速度差异。 如果是 Mac OS X 用户，可以用下面这条指令强制刷新： dscacheutil -flushcache |
 | 18 majunbo 2010-09-19 16:05:34 +08:00 貌似WWW比APPSPOT快啊。 （郑州网通） |
| 19 yiyang 2010-09-19 16:06:24 +08:00 ping www.v2ex.com 要快点。。。 |
| 20 Livid MOD OP PRO 在某些访问国外网站不是太快的地方，如果确实是通过新渠道访问的话，那么延迟有可能会比直接访问 appspot 低。 |
| 21 majunbo 2010-09-19 16:11:04 +08:00 |
| 22 yoyicue 2010-09-19 16:12:10 +08:00 Pinging common.xgslb.net [202.108.251.39] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.108.251.39: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=54 Reply from 202.108.251.39: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=54 Reply from 202.108.251.39: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=54 Reply from 202.108.251.39: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54 Ping statistics for 202.108.251.39: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 68ms, Average = 29ms |
| 23 yoyicue 2010-09-19 16:14:31 +08:00 @yoyicue http://www.xgslb.net/html/wl011.html WebLuker SeeC服务（MiniCDN服务）提供所有CDN服务基本功能，通过智能的流量调度，将用户的访问解析到就近节点上，提高用户的访问质量 |
 | 24 fish 2010-09-19 16:17:32 +08:00 直观感觉差不多 |
 | 25 AJ 2010-09-19 16:18:37 +08:00 感上者差不多，但v2ex.appspot.com是用SSH上的，v2ex.com是直接上的 |
 | 26 dismory 2010-09-19 16:19:36 +08:00 |
 | 27 gonbo 2010-09-19 16:20:25 +08:00 CDN 是吧，发贴还是会快不了， 动态内容也快不了。 不要迷信。 哈哈 |
 | 28 POPOEVER 2010-09-19 16:23:31 +08:00 C:\Users\POPO>ping www.v2ex.com 正在 Ping common.xgslb.net [61.164.153.133] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 61.164.153.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=11ms TTL=55 来自 61.164.153.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=11ms TTL=55 来自 61.164.153.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=11ms TTL=55 来自 61.164.153.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=11ms TTL=55 61.164.153.133 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 11ms，最长 = 11ms，平均 = 11ms |
 | 29 Hlbice 2010-09-19 16:31:14 +08:00 Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. H:\Users\hlbice>ping v2ex.com Pinging v2ex.com [72.47.224.92] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 72.47.224.92: bytes=32 time=215ms TTL=46 Reply from 72.47.224.92: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=46 Reply from 72.47.224.92: bytes=32 time=215ms TTL=46 Reply from 72.47.224.92: bytes=32 time=214ms TTL=46 Ping statistics for 72.47.22492: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 214ms, Maximum = 217ms, Average = 215ms 浙江联通 |
 | 30 Kymair 2010-09-19 16:32:27 +08:00 从Ping的结果来看，v2ex.com要比appspot快 但是从打开页面的速度来看， 明显感觉appspot要更快一些 |
 | 31 xinzhi 2010-09-19 16:38:22 +08:00 xinzhi@xinzhi-laptop:~$ ping www.v2ex.com PING common.xgslb.net (119.147.113.103) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 119.147.113.103: icmp_req=1 ttl=55 time=34.6 ms 64 bytes from 119.147.113.103: icmp_req=2 ttl=55 time=36.6 ms 64 bytes from 119.147.113.103: icmp_req=3 ttl=55 time=37.3 ms 64 bytes from 119.147.113.103: icmp_req=4 ttl=55 time=36.2 ms 64 bytes from 119.147.113.103: icmp_req=5 ttl=55 time=37.1 ms ^C64 bytes from 119.147.113.103: icmp_req=6 ttl=55 time=36.8 ms --- common.xgslb.net ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 25317ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.672/36.479/37.340/0.888 ms xinzhi@xinzhi-laptop:~$ ping www.google.com PING www-g-com-chn.l.google.com (66.249.89.104) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from nrt04s01-in-f104.1e100.net (66.249.89.104): icmp_req=1 ttl=52 time=96.3 ms 64 bytes from nrt04s01-in-f104.1e100.net (66.249.89.104): icmp_req=2 ttl=52 time=97.7 ms 64 bytes from nrt04s01-in-f104.1e100.net (66.249.89.104): icmp_req=3 ttl=52 time=95.0 ms 64 bytes from nrt04s01-in-f104.1e100.net (66.249.89.104): icmp_req=4 ttl=52 time=95.7 ms 64 bytes from nrt04s01-in-f104.1e100.net (66.249.89.104): icmp_req=5 ttl=52 time=96.2 ms ^C --- www-g-com-chn.l.google.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 95.009/96.220/97.732/0.959 ms xinzhi@xinzhi-laptop:~$ |
 | 32 kollinchu 2010-09-19 16:40:26 +08:00 武汉电信 Pinging common.xgslb.net [61.164.153.133] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 61.164.153.133: bytes=32 time=652ms TTL=56 Reply from 61.164.153.133: bytes=32 time=883ms TTL=56 Reply from 61.164.153.133: bytes=32 time=646ms TTL=56 Reply from 61.164.153.133: bytes=32 time=485ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 61.164.153.133: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 485ms, Maximum = 883ms, Average = 666ms |
| 33 Kymair 2010-09-19 16:40:42 +08:00 http://cl.ly/ba200caec76ce6f16fa7 上面是appspot，下面是v2ex.com 用Chrome Developer Tools同时访问首页得出的简单对比 实际感受也是v2ex.com比较慢 广东电信4M ADSL |
 | 34 lianghai 2010-09-19 16:44:18 +08:00 |
 | 35 upsky 2010-09-19 17:43:36 +08:00 |
| 36 upsky 2010-09-19 17:44:32 +08:00 |
| 37 upsky 2010-09-19 17:46:05 +08:00 从实际感受上来看，appsot比www似乎还快一小点。 |
| 38 gonbo 2010-09-19 17:56:56 +08:00 |
 | 39 msino 2010-09-19 19:29:45 +08:00 C:\Users\Owen>ping www.v2ex.com 正在 Ping common.xgslb.net [119.147.113.103] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 119.147.113.103 的回复: 字节=32 时间=28ms TTL=54 来自 119.147.113.103 的回复: 字节=32 时间=31ms TTL=54 来自 119.147.113.103 的回复: 字节=32 时间=27ms TTL=54 来自 119.147.113.103 的回复: 字节=32 时间=27ms TTL=54 119.147.113.103 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 27ms，最长 = 31ms，平均 = 28ms |
 | 40 GG2 2010-09-19 19:50:13 +08:00 GG2@GG2:~$ ping www.v2ex.com PING common.xgslb.net (121.14.235.122) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq1 ttl=55 time=35.9 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=32.5 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=33.1 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=34.0 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=34.9 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=34.2 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=32.3 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=34.5 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=34.4 ms |
 | 41 riophae 2010-09-19 19:54:54 +08:00 差不多. 河北唐山. 联通. 还有. 登陆后为什么不返回登录前页面呢. |
 | 42 fanzeyi 2010-09-19 19:55:19 +08:00 @majunbo 你是郑州哪的呃？ C:\Users\Fanzeyi>ping www.v2ex.com 正在 Ping common.xgslb.net [202.108.251.39] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=25ms TTL=55 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=25ms TTL=55 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=26ms TTL=55 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=24ms TTL=55 202.108.251.39 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 24ms，最长 = 26ms，平均 = 25ms |
 | 43 nAODI 2010-09-19 20:13:31 +08:00 不错啊，比appspot 快很多 PING common.xgslb.net (61.164.153.133): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=21.421 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=26.161 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=24.656 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=23.987 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=23.926 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=22.893 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=21.878 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=32.653 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=25.480 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=23.901 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 time=23.263 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=11 ttl=55 time=22.998 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=12 ttl=55 time=21.421 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=13 ttl=55 time=27.301 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=14 ttl=55 time=25.716 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=15 ttl=55 time=24.986 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=16 ttl=55 time=24.139 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=17 ttl=55 time=22.851 ms 64 bytes from 61.164.153.133: icmp_seq=18 ttl=55 time=22.438 ms appspot 平均在100多 |
 | 44 ksky 2010-09-19 20:28:48 +08:00 iSlast:~ Ksky$ ping www.v2ex.com PING common.xgslb.net (121.14.235.122): 56 data bytes Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=86.220 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=88.457 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=89.133 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=5 ttl=45 time=88.956 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=6 ttl=45 time=115.114 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=7 ttl=45 time=85.396 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=8 ttl=45 time=86.416 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=9 ttl=45 time=97.436 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=10 ttl=45 time=100.842 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=11 ttl=45 time=101.425 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=12 ttl=45 time=100.745 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=13 ttl=45 time=99.805 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=14 ttl=45 time=100.791 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=15 ttl=45 time=95.521 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=16 ttl=45 time=99.825 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=17 ttl=45 time=96.334 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=18 ttl=45 time=96.360 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=19 ttl=45 time=93.809 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=20 ttl=45 time=94.683 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=21 ttl=45 time=97.549 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=22 ttl=45 time=103.451 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=23 ttl=45 time=96.922 ms 64 bytes from 121.14.235.122: icmp_seq=24 ttl=45 time=92.771 ms |
 | 45 ipopo 2010-09-19 20:33:24 +08:00 福建电信 C:\Users\Popo>ping www.v2ex.com 正在 Ping common.xgslb.net [119.147.113.103] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 119.147.113.103 的回复: 字节=32 时间=35ms TTL=53 来自 119.147.113.103 的回复: 字节=32 时间=39ms TTL=53 来自 119.147.113.103 的回复: 字节=32 时间=36ms TTL=53 来自 119.147.113.103 的回复: 字节=32 时间=63ms TTL=53 119.147.113.103 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 35ms，最长 = 63ms，平均 = 43ms |
 | 46 Los 2010-09-19 21:25:56 +08:00 这个ping没有太大的实在意义，毕竟v2ex还要通过服务器中转appsot的数据，除非v2ex跟appsot的网络是直联的。 |
 | 47 fehu2005 2010-09-19 22:06:15 +08:00 速度有质的飞跃，我原来还提过ww.v2ex.com打开速度太慢 高科技果然不一样 |
 | 48 Leo 2010-09-20 00:34:40 +08:00 C:\Users\L>ping www.v2ex.com 正在 Ping common.xgslb.net [202.108.251.39] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=45ms TTL=48 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=45ms TTL=48 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=45ms TTL=48 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=45ms TTL=48 202.108.251.39 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 45ms，最长 = 45ms，平均 = 45ms |
| 49 Leo 2010-09-20 00:37:03 +08:00 C:\Users\L>ping v2ex.appspot.com 正在 Ping appspot.l.google.com [74.125.153.141] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 74.125.153.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=94ms TTL=44 来自 74.125.153.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=95ms TTL=44 来自 74.125.153.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=94ms TTL=44 来自 74.125.153.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=94ms TTL=44 74.125.153.141 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 94ms，最长 = 95ms，平均 = 94ms 快将近一倍 |
| 50 yiyang 2010-09-20 00:57:02 +08:00 在家也是 50MS以下 4MB ADSL 还不错 介绍一下？ |
 | 51 leaf 2010-09-20 01:57:59 +08:00 感觉appspot快多了~~ 首次打开v2ex等了很长时间 |
| 52 gonbo 2010-09-20 08:24:37 +08:00 PING 没有用，主要看load速度。 打开firebug看。 |
 | 53 colorjd 2010-09-20 09:34:54 +08:00 上海电信，FTTP+LAN，ping的结果很牛！但实际打开页面的速度却感觉一般。 Pinging common.xgslb.net [61.164.153.133] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 61.164.153.133: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=55 Reply from 61.164.153.133: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=55 Reply from 61.164.153.133: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=55 Reply from 61.164.153.133: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=55 Ping statistics for 61.164.153.133: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 10ms, Average = 9ms |
 | 55 zhaiduo 2010-09-20 12:32:07 +08:00 广州5M ADSL appspot的快 |
 | 56 joynic 2010-09-20 12:37:24 +08:00 via iPhone 感觉打开首页还是挺慢的。 |
 | 57 rse43 2010-09-20 12:43:17 +08:00 v2ex这样的站，连头像都不自己host，能缓存的估计就只有css和js了吧，CDN的加速作用十分有限啊。上海电信ping值在11ms左右，但速度明显慢于直连appspot。 |
 | 58 Orz 2010-09-20 12:43:27 +08:00 v2ex.com慢的不是一点点。 |
| 59 rse43 2010-09-20 12:52:41 +08:00 |
 | 60 ato 2010-09-20 17:49:42 +08:00 实在很杯具，速度慢得不一点两点啊。 |
| 61 ato 2010-09-20 17:50:32 +08:00 只能换用http://v2ex.appspot.com/访问了。 |
 | 62 qifei 2010-09-20 18:35:30 +08:00 北京电信 v2ex.com 不是一般的慢，appspot.com 很快。 |
 | 63 ooof 2010-09-20 18:38:57 +08:00 山西某地网通，慢的不意思。:) C:\Users\ooof>ping v2ex.appspot.com 正在 Ping appspot.l.google.com [74.125.71.141] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 74.125.71.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=238ms TTL=48 来自 74.125.71.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=236ms TTL=48 来自 74.125.71.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=234ms TTL=48 来自 74.125.71.141 的回复: 字节=32 时间=238ms TTL=48 74.125.71.141 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 234ms，最长 = 238ms，平均 = 236ms C:\Users\ooof>ping v2ex.com 正在 Ping v2ex.com [72.47.224.92] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 72.47.224.92 的回复: 字节=32 时间=219ms TTL=47 来自 72.47.224.92 的回复: 字节=32 时间=218ms TTL=47 来自 72.47.224.92 的回复: 字节=32 时间=218ms TTL=47 来自 72.47.224.92 的回复: 字节=32 时间=218ms TTL=47 72.47.224.92 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 218ms，最长 = 219ms，平均 = 218ms |
| 64 ooof 2010-09-20 18:40:06 +08:00 恩， www.v2ex.com 的很快。 C:\Users\ooof>ping www.v2ex.com 正在 Ping common.xgslb.net [202.108.251.39] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=16ms TTL=53 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=16ms TTL=53 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=16ms TTL=53 来自 202.108.251.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=16ms TTL=53 202.108.251.39 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 16ms，最长 = 16ms，平均 = 16ms C:\Users\ooof>ping v2ex.com 正在 Ping v2ex.com [72.47.224.92] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 72.47.224.92 的回复: 字节=32 时间=219ms TTL=47 来自 72.47.224.92 的回复: 字节=32 时间=219ms TTL=47 来自 72.47.224.92 的回复: 字节=32 时间=219ms TTL=47 来自 72.47.224.92 的回复: 字节=32 时间=218ms TTL=47 72.47.224.92 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 218ms，最长 = 219ms，平均 = 218ms |
 | 66 lejoy 2010-10-13 10:10:05 +08:00 貌似www.v2ex.com不是跑在高科技产品上，而是 fast.v2ex.com.大家可以ping一下 fast.v2ex.com |
 | 68 muxi 2010-12-01 10:13:04 +08:00 Pinging www.v2ex.com [199.71.214.27] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 199.71.214.27: bytes=32 time=210ms TTL=52 Reply from 199.71.214.27: bytes=32 time=208ms TTL=52 Reply from 199.71.214.27: bytes=32 time=209ms TTL=52 Reply from 199.71.214.27: bytes=32 time=209ms TTL=52 Ping statistics for 199.71.214.27: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 208ms, Maximum = 210ms, Average = 209ms |
| 69 muxi 2010-12-01 10:13:50 +08:00 忘了说了，光纤接入 |
 | 70 alai 2010-12-01 11:21:25 +08:00 C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping www.v2ex.com Pinging www.v2ex.com [199.71.214.27] with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Reply from 199.71.214.27: bytes=32 time=294ms TTL=52 Reply from 199.71.214.27: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=52 Reply from 199.71.214.27: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=52 Ping statistics for 199.71.214.27: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 265ms, Maximum = 294ms, Average = 279ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping v2ex.appspot.com Pinging appspot.l.google.com [64.233.183.141] with 32 bytes of data Reply from 64.233.183.141: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=49 Reply from 64.233.183.141: bytes=32 time=169ms TTL=49 Reply from 64.233.183.141: bytes=32 time=168ms TTL=49 Reply from 64.233.183.141: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 64.233.183.141: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 166ms, Maximum = 169ms, Average = 167ms |
 | 71 disney2002 2011-01-12 09:31:58 +08:00 想知道的是v2ex域名绑定这块和appspot是如何配置的呢？ |
 | 72 26z 2011-01-12 09:39:41 +08:00 Ping statistics for 199.71.214.27: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 202ms, Maximum = 221ms, Average = 212ms |
 | 73 jimmy 2011-01-12 09:42:10 +08:00 昨天晚上要打开十分困难。 今天速度快很多了。 |
| 74 chouj 2011-02-16 10:26:48 +08:00 觉得最近V2EX载入困难，首页右侧栏载入到RSS图标位置后要卡好久。 |
 | 75 jckwei 2011-02-16 10:43:17 +08:00 |
 | 76 faydao 2011-02-16 17:52:09 +08:00 使用you8g.com的服务，结果挂了…… Livid是怎么绑定的。。？ |
 | 77 dongsheng 2011-02-22 16:45:32 +08:00 国外（澳洲）访问 www.v2ex.com 很慢，v2ex.appspot.com 要快很多 |
 | 78 bindiry 2011-02-22 23:06:41 +08:00 青岛联通 C:\Users\Lam>ping www.v2ex.com 正在 Ping www.v2ex.com [199.71.214.27] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 199.71.214.27 的回复: 字节=32 时间=246ms TTL=55 来自 199.71.214.27 的回复: 字节=32 时间=249ms TTL=55 来自 199.71.214.27 的回复: 字节=32 时间=246ms TTL=55 来自 199.71.214.27 的回复: 字节=32 时间=250ms TTL=55 |
Select Language