阿里美拔了 IP 下 - V2EX
V2EX = way to explore
V2EX 是一个关于分享和探索的地方
Sign Up Now
For Existing Member  Sign In
Recommended Services
Amazon Web Services
LeanCloud
New Relic
ClearDB
Yamade

阿里美拔了 IP 下

  •  
  •   Yamade Mar 3, 2015 7960 views
    This topic created in 4077 days ago, the information mentioned may be changed or developed.
    IP: 198.11.174.62
    下: 198.11.174.62/test
    我的:1M
    Supplement 1    Mar 3, 2015
    美国按带宽收费就是个笑话.
    54 replies    2015-03-05 14:23:47 +08:00
    xiaozhizhu1997
        1
    xiaozhizhu1997  
       Mar 3, 2015 via Android
    按M卖真心没吸引力…
    Yamade
        2
    Yamade  
    OP
       Mar 3, 2015
    @xiaozhizhu1997 .有SLB 5毛/g+2毛一小服.
    NewYear
        3
    NewYear  
       Mar 3, 2015
    这么一个nginx的首页 花了15秒才打开
    invite
        4
    invite  
       Mar 3, 2015
    赤果果的炫富
    chon
        5
    chon  
       Mar 3, 2015
    这网络……丢包率怎么那么高
    coosir
        6
    coosir  
       Mar 3, 2015
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=6079.097 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=6261.837 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=6178.276 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=5892.176 ms
    jasontse
        7
    jasontse  
       Mar 3, 2015 via iPad
    平均延迟 5 秒,好感动。
    Yamade
        8
    Yamade  
    OP
       Mar 3, 2015
    @jasontse 你在阿里云?
    Yamade
        9
    Yamade  
    OP
       Mar 3, 2015
    @coosir
    @chon
    如果你是玩vps的,ping太续费.你需要 mtr --report
    chon
        10
    chon  
       Mar 3, 2015
    @Yamade 就是用mtr测试才发现丢包率太高,而且是发生在最后一跳。
    shmilyin
        11
    shmilyin  
       Mar 3, 2015
    正在 Ping 198.11.174.62 具有 32 字节的数据:
    请求超时。
    请求超时。
    请求超时。
    请求超时。

    198.11.174.62 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 0,丢失 = 4 (100% 丢失),
    Actrace
        12
    Actrace  
       Mar 3, 2015
    美国阿里云就是个笑话,国外价格战反正也打不赢其他人。。。更别提没有了备案优势,,阿里云还剩下什么。。。
    linkupmylife
        13
    linkupmylife  
       Mar 3, 2015
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5188ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5890ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=6286ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5188ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=4489ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=4038ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=4989ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=4989ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5688ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5789ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5387ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=4938ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5138ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5738ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=6688ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=6688ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5547ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5038ms TTL=47
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=4839ms TTL=47
    kn007
        14
    kn007  
       Mar 3, 2015
    同意12楼@Actrace ,阿里云对我来说就是备案的工具。。
    yeqiu
        15
    yeqiu  
       Mar 3, 2015
    正在 Ping 198.11.174.62 具有 32 字节的数据:
    请求超时。
    请求超时。
    请求超时。
    请求超时。

    198.11.174.62 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 0,丢失 = 4 (100% 丢失),
    arachide
        16
    arachide  
       Mar 3, 2015
    @Actrace 马大忽悠说过阿里云一到 aws就哭

    :-)
    shixinyu
        17
    shixinyu  
       Mar 3, 2015
    什么鬼,在美国ping这个IP都要超时到2秒以上了……这个速度要给谁用呢?
    lmaq
        18
    lmaq  
       Mar 3, 2015
    这慢的...
    lmaq
        19
    lmaq  
       Mar 3, 2015
    看阿里云论坛有人和你一个段,访问明显快啊 198.11.174.41
    zxhzxhz
        20
    zxhzxhz  
       Mar 3, 2015
    正在 Ping 198.11.174.62 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=196ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=194ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=195ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=196ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=196ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=199ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=199ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=194ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=199ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=195ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=196ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=195ms TTL=51

    198.11.174.62 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 14,已接收 = 14,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 194ms,最长 = 199ms,平均 = 196ms

    还不错啊
    billwsy
        21
    billwsy  
       Mar 3, 2015
    San Diego, CA

    ~ ping 198.11.174.62
    PING 198.11.174.62 (198.11.174.62): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=22.821 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=22.928 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=23.143 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=22.933 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=23.005 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=22.979 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=22.849 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=23.002 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=22.916 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=22.972 ms
    ^C
    --- 198.11.174.62 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 22.821/22.955/23.143/0.085 ms
    wdlth
        22
    wdlth  
       Mar 3, 2015
    阿里云美国成功把直连推向300ms……
    jq3247443
        23
    jq3247443  
       Mar 3, 2015
    没有性价比 我的板瓦工
    正在 Ping 45.62.------ 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=154ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=157ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=156ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=154ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=155ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=153ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=157ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=153ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=154ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=160ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=154ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=158ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=153ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=155ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=152ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=155ms TTL=47
    来自 45.62.------ 的回复: 字节=32 时间=154ms TTL=47

    45.62.------ 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 17,已接收 = 17,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 152ms,最长 = 160ms,平均 = 154ms
    Jetso
        24
    Jetso  
       Mar 3, 2015 via Android
    美国vps带宽1m本身就是个笑话,测毛线
    archbishop
        25
    archbishop  
       Mar 3, 2015
    搬瓦工ping很快啊!
    PING 198.11.174.62 (198.11.174.62) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=23.9 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=23.9 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=12 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=13 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=14 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=16 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=17 ttl=50 time=24.2 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=18 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=19 ttl=50 time=23.8 ms
    ^C
    --- 198.11.174.62 ping statistics ---
    19 packets transmitted, 19 received, 0% packet loss, time 18511ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.801/23.876/24.221/0.213 ms
    invite
        26
    invite  
       Mar 3, 2015
    看了那么多ping结果,至于知道,阿里云其实不是部署在美国的,丫的人家的机房都上火星去了。
    Felldeadbird
        27
    Felldeadbird  
       Mar 3, 2015
    阿里云的磁盘估计一样是慢
    bugeye
        28
    bugeye  
       Mar 3, 2015
    从国内都ping不通,不知道是什么黑科技。
    aksoft
        29
    aksoft  
       Mar 3, 2015
    ~ ping 198.11.174.62
    PING 198.11.174.62 (198.11.174.62): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=169.765 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=176.308 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=178.756 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=165.973 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=171.983 ms
    800126
        30
    800126  
       Mar 3, 2015
    我在墙外ping的

    正在 Ping 198.11.174.62 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=223ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=223ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=224ms TTL=51
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=223ms TTL=51

    198.11.174.62 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 223ms,最长 = 224ms,平均 = 223ms
    liuchen9586
        31
    liuchen9586  
       Mar 3, 2015
    阿里云是个什么垃圾啊……
    derek80
        32
    derek80  
       Mar 3, 2015
    10.2 KB/s - 347 KB of 100 MB, 3 hours left
    http://198.11.174.62/test
    rainy3636
        33
    rainy3636  
       Mar 3, 2015
    root@QingCloud-PEK2:~# mtr -r -c 100 -s 64 198.11.174.62
    Start: Tue Mar 3 20:18:36 2015
    HOST: QingCloud-PEK2 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1.|-- 10.80.171.1 0.0% 100 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0
    2.|-- 10.16.40.231 0.0% 100 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.0
    3.|-- 119.254.100.1 0.0% 100 1.2 1.5 0.9 15.4 1.6
    4.|-- 119.254.106.217 0.0% 100 1.3 1.2 0.9 2.6 0.1
    5.|-- 119.253.6.93 0.0% 100 2.0 1.9 1.5 2.6 0.0
    6.|-- 119.253.6.49 0.0% 100 0.4 12.8 0.3 62.6 17.9
    7.|-- 119.253.5.17 0.0% 100 0.9 3.6 0.7 59.7 9.5
    8.|-- 119.253.3.61 0.0% 100 0.9 1.7 0.8 32.6 4.3
    9.|-- 119.253.3.169 3.0% 100 0.8 0.9 0.7 1.2 0.0
    10.|-- 119.253.0.66 0.0% 100 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.2 0.0
    11.|-- 181.5.142.219.broad.bj.bj 1.0% 100 3.4 6.6 2.2 10.2 1.7
    12.|-- bj141-130-65.bjtelecom.ne 93.0% 100 1.8 2.5 1.8 4.4 0.6
    13.|-- 202.97.57.209 0.0% 100 2.9 3.9 1.8 6.1 1.0
    14.|-- 202.97.53.170 0.0% 100 5.5 4.7 1.8 39.2 4.4
    15.|-- 202.97.58.86 3.0% 100 7.4 7.4 3.4 11.8 1.7
    16.|-- 202.97.52.182 1.0% 100 170.6 169.8 165.7 202.3 3.6
    17.|-- 203.14.186.38 0.0% 100 171.7 173.7 170.3 231.0 8.7
    18.|-- 218.30.43.18 2.0% 100 182.4 184.1 168.5 256.0 23.0
    19.|-- 198.11.128.125 3.0% 100 246.0 182.6 166.7 250.3 20.9
    rainy3636
        34
    rainy3636  
       Mar 3, 2015
    20.|-- 198.11.128.205 2.0% 100 174.8 173.8 170.7 198.0 2.9
    21.|-- ??? 100.0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    22.|-- 198.11.174.62 2.0% 100 192.9 191.8 188.7 196.8 1.5

    没贴全
    wy315700
        35
    wy315700  
       Mar 3, 2015
    速度还行啊

    $ ping 198.11.174.62
    PING 198.11.174.62 (198.11.174.62): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=44 time=244.254 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=278.633 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 time=272.876 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=44 time=283.166 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=44 time=284.705 ms
    h4lt
        36
    h4lt  
       Mar 3, 2015
    ping 198.11.174.62
    PING 198.11.174.62 (198.11.174.62): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=451.504 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=402.441 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=337.716 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=317.139 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=377.674 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=502.583 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=49 time=419.467 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=49 time=336.474 ms
    ^C
    --- 198.11.174.62 ping statistics ---
    8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 317.139/393.125/502.583/59.647 ms
    Slienc7
        37
    Slienc7  
       Mar 3, 2015 via Android
    440 ms
    codegear
        38
    codegear  
       Mar 3, 2015
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=67 ttl=44 time=930 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=68 ttl=44 time=830 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=69 ttl=44 time=978 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=70 ttl=44 time=929 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=71 ttl=44 time=1077 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=72 ttl=44 time=1131 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=73 ttl=44 time=1021 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=74 ttl=44 time=1172 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=75 ttl=44 time=966 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=76 ttl=44 time=968 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=77 ttl=44 time=919 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=78 ttl=44 time=969 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=79 ttl=44 time=1018 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=80 ttl=44 time=969 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=82 ttl=44 time=912 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=83 ttl=44 time=954 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=84 ttl=44 time=902 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=85 ttl=44 time=899 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=86 ttl=44 time=954 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=88 ttl=44 time=953 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=90 ttl=44 time=946 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=91 ttl=44 time=886 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=92 ttl=44 time=938 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=93 ttl=44 time=883 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=94 ttl=44 time=936 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_req=95 ttl=44 time=888 ms
    ^C
    --- 198.11.174.62 ping statistics ---
    97 packets transmitted, 90 received, 7% packet loss, time 48070ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 804.531/869.815/1172.969/70.420 ms, pipe 3


    魔都电信,不忍直视
    zhjits
        39
    zhjits  
       Mar 3, 2015
    浙江电信 20M

    PING 198.11.174.62 (198.11.174.62): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=894.963 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=893.418 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=959.129 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=947.908 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=937.762 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=941.191 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=928.338 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=932.863 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=931.322 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=921.913 ms

    --- 198.11.174.62 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 893.418/928.881/959.129/19.965 ms
    HanSonJ
        40
    HanSonJ  
       Mar 3, 2015
    我想问这个能否翻墙?
    killerand1983
        41
    killerand1983  
       Mar 3, 2015
    PING 198.11.174.62 (198.11.174.62): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=41 time=384.590 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=41 time=428.311 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=41 time=451.397 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=41 time=472.717 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=41 time=490.072 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=41 time=411.034 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=41 time=399.025 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=41 time=450.686 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=8 ttl=41 time=376.792 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=9 ttl=41 time=387.265 ms
    BlueCloud
        42
    BlueCloud  
       Mar 3, 2015
    凑合吧

    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=224 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=228 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=236 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=221 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=46 time=220 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=46 time=215 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=46 time=211 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=8 ttl=46 time=210 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=9 ttl=46 time=285 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=10 ttl=46 time=327 ms
    ^C
    --- 198.11.174.62 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9010ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 210.728/238.194/327.601/36.133 ms
    worldask
        43
    worldask  
       Mar 3, 2015
    ~ ping 198.11.174.62
    PING 198.11.174.62 (198.11.174.62): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=213.130 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=215.136 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=218.208 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=216.598 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=248.232 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=214.275 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=214.522 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=241.722 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=216.715 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=213.201 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=231.162 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=11 ttl=51 time=214.855 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=12 ttl=51 time=214.115 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=13 ttl=51 time=218.889 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=14 ttl=51 time=215.208 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=15 ttl=51 time=215.687 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 16
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=17 ttl=51 time=212.847 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=18 ttl=51 time=214.500 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=19 ttl=51 time=214.176 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=20 ttl=51 time=215.068 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=21 ttl=51 time=215.894 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=22 ttl=51 time=213.914 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=23 ttl=51 time=217.041 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=24 ttl=51 time=213.967 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=25 ttl=51 time=214.904 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=26 ttl=51 time=217.264 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=27 ttl=51 time=216.117 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=215.889 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=29 ttl=51 time=216.481 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=30 ttl=51 time=213.026 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=31 ttl=51 time=214.776 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=32 ttl=51 time=217.526 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=33 ttl=51 time=213.408 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=34 ttl=51 time=215.073 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=35 ttl=51 time=214.560 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=36 ttl=51 time=247.758 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=37 ttl=51 time=213.499 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=38 ttl=51 time=212.817 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=39 ttl=51 time=242.597 ms
    ^C
    --- 198.11.174.62 ping statistics ---
    40 packets transmitted, 39 packets received, 2.5% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 212.817/218.584/248.232/9.467 ms

    福建电信
    master
        44
    master  
       Mar 4, 2015
    其实想按流量收费也可以啊,再买个按流量收费的SLB就好了,虽然说费用估计也是天价 →_→
    yurited
        45
    yurited  
       Mar 4, 2015
    美国硅谷测试

    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=6.513 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=7.913 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=5.839 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=7.485 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=29.516 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=6.352 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=8.720 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=7.939 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=8 ttl=52 time=5.801 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=9 ttl=52 time=7.012 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=10 ttl=52 time=6.399 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=11 ttl=52 time=6.603 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=12 ttl=52 time=66.470 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=13 ttl=52 time=9.322 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=14 ttl=52 time=6.537 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=15 ttl=52 time=7.547 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=16 ttl=52 time=6.355 ms
    kobiwxl
        46
    kobiwxl  
       Mar 4, 2015
    PING 198.11.174.62 (198.11.174.62): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=430.756 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=464.835 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=462.494 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=627.734 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=479.314 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=593.031 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=397.232 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=442.796 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 9
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=444.882 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 11
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 12
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 13
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=14 ttl=51 time=406.505 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 15
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=16 ttl=51 time=393.383 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 17
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 18
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 19
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=20 ttl=51 time=426.272 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=21 ttl=51 time=414.637 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 22
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 23
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=24 ttl=51 time=395.807 ms
    ^C
    --- 198.11.174.62 ping statistics ---
    26 packets transmitted, 14 packets received, 46.2% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 393.383/455.691/627.734/68.614 ms
    arachide
        47
    arachide  
       Mar 4, 2015
    扒拉半坨屎里没消化的几颗黄豆 争论营养多少

    有意义吗
    AII
        48
    AII  
       Mar 4, 2015
    TraceRoute看了下结果。

    服务器架在中国电信美国线路上,电信党访问有绝对优势,延迟最低可100ms以下。
    联通访问也能达满速,延迟200ms左右。
    移动略悲剧了,延迟1s左右。

    当然这个也与网络实际情况和时段等有关系。
    leavic
        49
    leavic  
       Mar 4, 2015
    $ ping 198.11.174.62 -t

    正在 Ping 198.11.174.62 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=176ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=176ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=174ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=176ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=175ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=176ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=175ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=173ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=174ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=175ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=207ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=198ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=176ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=190ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=204ms TTL=44
    请求超时。
    请求超时。
    请求超时。
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=179ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=177ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=180ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=175ms TTL=44
    来自 198.11.174.62 的回复: 字节=32 时间=174ms TTL=44
    xiaogui
        50
    xiaogui  
       Mar 4, 2015
    北美速度挺快

    ping 198.11.174.62
    PING 198.11.174.62 (198.11.174.62): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=34.762 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=34.774 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=34.910 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=36.408 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=32.197 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=35.276 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=35.300 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=35.061 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=35.793 ms
    64 bytes from 198.11.174.62: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=35.663 ms
    shixinyu
        51
    shixinyu  
       Mar 4, 2015
    看来之前这个IP网络有问题,现在表现就好多了:

    Pinging 198.11.174.62 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=50
    quericy
        52
    quericy  
       Mar 4, 2015
    @shixinyu 是么,我ping是300+ms
    ippip
        53
    ippip  
       Mar 5, 2015
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=491ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=407ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=423ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=439ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=489ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=419ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=451ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=498ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=413ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=429ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=429ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=445ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=517ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=496ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=441ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=441ms TTL=50
    Reply from 198.11.174.62: bytes=32 time=441ms TTL=50


    50M宽带下载速度120K+
    shixinyu
        54
    shixinyu  
       Mar 5, 2015
    @quericy 我那个是在美国CA的线路上ping的。
    About     Help     Advertise     Blog     API     FAQ     Solana     1009 Online   Highest 6679       Select Language
    创意工作者们的社区
    World is powered by soltude
    VERSION: 3.9.8.5 215ms UTC 23:26 PVG 07:26 LAX 16:26 JFK 19:26
    Do have faith in what you're doing.
    ubao msn snddm index pchome yahoo rakuten mypaper meadowduck bidyahoo youbao zxmzxm asda bnvcg cvbfg dfscv mmhjk xxddc yybgb zznbn ccubao uaitu acv GXCV ET GDG YH FG BCVB FJFH CBRE CBC GDG ET54 WRWR RWER WREW WRWER RWER SDG EW SF DSFSF fbbs ubao fhd dfg ewr dg df ewwr ewwr et ruyut utut dfg fgd gdfgt etg dfgt dfgd ert4 gd fgg wr 235 wer3 we vsdf sdf gdf ert xcv sdf rwer hfd dfg cvb rwf afb dfh jgh bmn lgh rty gfds cxv xcv xcs vdas fdf fgd cv sdf tert sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf shasha9178 shasha9178 shasha9178 shasha9178 shasha9178 liflif2 liflif2 liflif2 liflif2 liflif2 liblib3 liblib3 liblib3 liblib3 liblib3 zhazha444 zhazha444 zhazha444 zhazha444 zhazha444 dende5 dende denden denden2 denden21 fenfen9 fenf619 fen619 fenfe9 fe619 sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf zhazh90 zhazh0 zhaa50 zha90 zh590 zho zhoz zhozh zhozho zhozho2 lislis lls95 lili95 lils5 liss9 sdf0ty987 sdft876 sdft9876 sdf09876 sd0t9876 sdf0ty98 sdf0976 sdf0ty986 sdf0ty96 sdf0t76 sdf0876 df0ty98 sf0t876 sd0ty76 sdy76 sdf76 sdf0t76 sdf0ty9 sdf0ty98 sdf0ty987 sdf0ty98 sdf6676 sdf876 sd876 sd876 sdf6 sdf6 sdf9876 sdf0t sdf06 sdf0ty9776 sdf0ty9776 sdf0ty76 sdf8876 sdf0t sd6 sdf06 s688876 sd688 sdf86