
1 fengchang 2014-10-28 15:41:42 +08:00 Vixra is an absolute joke. It's where people send rubbish papers that can't pass the arXiv's very modest standards. I would strongly advise against this. http://math.stackexchange.com/a/402022 Gibbs' original motivation for starting the archive was to cater for researchers who believed that their preprints had been unfairly rejected or reclassified by the arXiv moderators. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ViXra |
2 wanjun 2014-10-28 15:44:58 +08:00 看起来好New B 呀 |
3 hljjhb 2014-10-28 16:02:35 +08:00 从头到尾只有重复了一次你的标题 不可信 |
4 leiz 2014-10-28 16:07:23 +08:00 你跟他聊聊,看后面要不要你寄钱过去做申请审核费再说 |
5 rwalle 2014-10-28 16:31:17 +08:00 via Android 搞民科你也稍微专业点啊,arxiv和vixra都分不清还是算了吧 |
6 songyuwen OP 各位这是眼红还是?这边文章不是我的,我仅仅转发。对于我而言,我只是对未知的东西充满探索的兴趣而已。 |
7 taine 2014-10-28 16:38:16 +08:00 假的 |
8 rwalle 2014-10-28 18:22:21 +08:00 via Android 转发?那你写清楚啊 有什么好眼红的?搞民科的继续活在自己的世界中吧 |
9 chaker 2014-10-28 19:07:56 +08:00 文章题目啥子意思?意淫出来的物理公理体系? |
10 casparchen 2014-10-28 20:12:49 +08:00 真想不通那些搞民科的都在想些什么 |
11 dorentus 2014-10-28 21:49:26 +08:00 其实信的内容暂且不提,www.bmsa.us www.isfs.org.in www.e-tet.org 这三个域名,看 whois 信息的话,本身就感觉有些奇怪;原作者不管是谁,还是小心一点,不要被骗了。 |
12 dorentus 2014-10-28 21:58:34 +08:00 另外楼主,这种第一人称叙述性的文章,你全文发 v2ex 和 rubychina,又不标转发,真是…… |